Malmö University Publications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 1 of 1
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Stolic, Nicole
    Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
    Does chemomechanical caries removal affect restoration survival?2015Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
    Abstract [en]

    Aim This systematic review aimed to summarize randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate the survival rates of restorations, comparing the Carisolv system to hand excavation and/or the conventional drilling method. The aim was also to collect all data in one place to be used for further research. Materials & Methods A database screening of PubMed and the Cochrane library was performed. One reviewer read all titles and abstracts, those considered of interest were fully scrutinized. A total of 9 articles were included and each was evaluated using the GRADE-system. The studies were appraised to have a low level of evidence. Results A total 913 teeth received treatment either with Carisolv, hand excavation and/or drilling. The studies evaluated the success rate of dental restorations at follow-ups between 6 months to two years. The results showed no significant difference in success rate of restorations made either by Carisolv, bur or hand excavation. Conclusions The results showed as high success rates for caries removal with Carisolv as with other methods, in terms of restoration survival, and that there was no statistically significant difference between the test group and control group. These results are encouraging for caries removal with Carisolv since it also can be used as an alternative treatment for children and patients with dental fear due to the less painful experience and lesser need for local anesthesia. The present studies on this subject are few and have limited evidence, thus underlining the need for more studies on the subject and studies with higher evidence for further research.

    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
1 - 1 of 1
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf