Test-retest reliability of two instruments for measuring public attitudes towards persons with mental illness

DSpace Repository

Test-retest reliability of two instruments for measuring public attitudes towards persons with mental illness

Show full item record

Files for download

main article
Facebook

Simple item record

Publication Article, peer reviewed scientific
Title Test-retest reliability of two instruments for measuring public attitudes towards persons with mental illness
Author(s) Svensson, Bengt ; Marklund, Urban ; Bejerholm, Ulrika ; Björkman, Tommy ; Brunt, David ; Eklund, Mona ; Hansson, Lars ; Leufstadius, Carin ; Lundvik-Gyllensten, Amanda ; Sandlund, Mikael ; Östman, Margareta
Date 2011
English abstract
Background Research has identified stigmatization as a major threat to successful treatment of individuals with mental illness. As a consequence several anti-stigma campaigns have been carried out. The results have been discouraging and the field suffers from lack of evidence about interventions that work. There are few reports on psychometric data for instruments used to assess stigma, which thus complicates research efforts. The aim of the present study was to investigate test-retest reliability of the Swedish versions of the questionnaires: FABI and "Changing Minds" and to examine the internal consistency of the two instruments. Method Two instruments, fear and behavioural intentions (FABI) and "Changing Minds", used in earlier studies on public attitudes towards persons with mental illness were translated into Swedish and completed by 51 nursing students on two occasions, with an interval of three weeks. Test-retest reliability was calculated by using weighted kappa coefficient and internal consistency using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Results Both instruments attain at best moderate test-retest reliability. For the Changing Minds questionnaire almost one fifth (17.9%) of the items present poor test-retest reliability and the alpha coefficient for the subscales ranges between 0.19 - 0.46. All of the items in the FABI reach a fair or a moderate agreement between the test and retest, and the questionnaire displays a high internal consistency, alpha 0.80. Conclusions There is a need for development of psychometrically tested instruments within this field of research.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-11 (link to publisher's fulltext)
Link http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/11/11 (external link to publication)
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
Host/Issue BMC Psychiatry;11
Volume 11
Language eng (iso)
Subject(s) Medicine
Research Subject Categories::MEDICINE
Handle http://hdl.handle.net/2043/12816 (link to this page)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Search


Browse

My Account

Statistics