Conceptual diversities and empirical shortcomings : a critical analysis of research on inclusive education

DSpace Repository

Conceptual diversities and empirical shortcomings : a critical analysis of research on inclusive education

Show full item record

Files for download

Find Full text There are no files associated with this item..

Facebook

Simple item record

Publication Article, review peer-reviewed scientific
Title Conceptual diversities and empirical shortcomings : a critical analysis of research on inclusive education
Author(s) Göransson, Kerstin ; Nilholm, Claes
Date 2014
English abstract
The purpose of this paper is to critically analyse research about inclusive education. Prior reviews and the outcome of a recent search of databases are analysed with regard to (a) how inclusion is defined and (b) what empirical knowledge there is regarding factors that make schools and classrooms more inclusive. Our point of departure is that we regard inclusion as an idea about what school systems, schools and classrooms should accomplish, and as such, an expression of an educational philosophy. Four different understandings of inclusive education were found: (a) inclusion as the placement of pupils with disabilities in mainstream classrooms, (b) inclusion as meeting the social/academic needs of pupils with disabilities, (c) inclusion as meeting the social/academic needs of all pupils and (d) inclusion as creation of communities. Under a strict definition of inclusive education, hardly any research was found which reliably identified factors that give rise to inclusive processes. The outcome of our analyses are discussed from the perspective that different understandings of inclusion should be seen, to a large extent, as expressions of different views of what schools should accomplish. We also propose that some of the adherents to inclusion as creation of communities can be placed in the grand educational tradition reaching back to Dewey that tries to establish new ideals for school systems in a society in which individualism is perhaps the main ideology. The main conclusions are that the operative meaning of inclusion in reviews and empirical research should be much more clearly defined and that new types of studies are needed.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933545 (link to publisher's fulltext)
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Host/Issue European Journal of Special Needs Education;3
Volume 29
ISSN 0885-6257
Pages 265-280
Language eng (iso)
Subject(s) Humanities/Social Sciences
Research Subject Categories::SOCIAL SCIENCES
Handle http://hdl.handle.net/2043/18154 (link to this page)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Search


Browse

My Account

Statistics