Long-term stability of orthodontic treatment and patient satisfaction. A systematic review

DSpace Repository

Long-term stability of orthodontic treatment and patient satisfaction. A systematic review

Show full item record

Files for download

Find Full text There are no files associated with this item..

Facebook

Simple item record

Publication Article, peer reviewed scientific
Title Long-term stability of orthodontic treatment and patient satisfaction. A systematic review
Author(s) Bondemark, Lars ; Holm, Anna-Karin ; Hansen, Ken ; Axelsson, Susanna ; Mohlin, Bengt ; Brattström, Viveka ; Paulin, Gunnar ; Pietila, Terttu
Date 2007
English abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate morphologic stability and patient satisfaction at least 5 years after orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Published literature was searched through the PubMed and Cochrane Library electronic databases from 1966 to January 2005. The search was performed by an information specialist at the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. The inclusion criteria consisted of a follow-up period of at least 5 years postretention; randomized clinical trials, prospective or retrospective clinical controlled studies, and cohort studies; and orthodontic treatment including fixed or removable appliances, selective grinding, or extractions. Two reviewers extracted the data independently and also assessed the quality of the studies. RESULTS: The search strategy resulted in 1004 abstracts or full-text articles, of which 38 met the inclusion criteria. Treatment of crowding resulted in successful dental alignment. However, the mandibular arch length and width gradually decreased, and crowding of the lower anterior teeth reoccurred postretention. This condition was unpredictable at the individual level (limited evidence). Treatment of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion with Herbst appliance normalized the occlusion. Relapse occurred but could not be predicted at the individual level (limited evidence). The scientific evidence was insufficient for conclusions on treatment of cross-bite, Angle Class III, open bite, and various other malocclusions as well as on patient satisfaction in a long-term perspective. CONCLUSIONS: This review has exposed the difficulties in drawing meaningful evidence-based conclusions often because of the inherent problems of retrospective and uncontrolled study design.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/011006-16R.1 (link to publisher's fulltext)
Host/Issue Angle orthodontist;1
Volume 77
ISSN 0003-3219
Pages 181-91
Language eng (iso)
Subject(s) Humanities/Social Sciences
Research Subject Categories::ODONTOLOGY
Handle http://hdl.handle.net/2043/4302 (link to this page)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Search


Browse

My Account

Statistics