Lavage Questionable in Treatment of Painful Reduced Mouth Opening (Stockholm)

DSpace Repository

Lavage Questionable in Treatment of Painful Reduced Mouth Opening (Stockholm)

Show full item record

Files for download

Find Full text There are no files associated with this item.

Facebook

Simple item record

Publication Conference Paper, other
Title Lavage Questionable in Treatment of Painful Reduced Mouth Opening (Stockholm)
Author(s) Englesson Sahlström, Lotta ; Ekberg, EwaCarin ; List, Thomas ; Petersson, Arne ; Eriksson, Lars
Date 2008
English abstract
Objective: To compare treatment with local anaesthetics and local anaesthetics in combination with lavage in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain and reduced mouth opening in a randomized controlled trial. Material and methods: Forty-one women and four men (mean age of 35 years) participated. All patients had had TMJ pain for more than 3 months, had reduced mouth opening capacity, and had non-reducing disc displacement confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. The patients were randomized to treatment with extra-articular local anaesthetic alone (control) or with extra-articular local anaesthetic in combination with lavage (treatment). All patients were examined at baseline and at 1 and 3 months by an examiner blind to treatment. Successful treatment was determined as 30% or more pain reduction on a 100-mm analog scale (VAS). Results: At baseline, mean pain intensity (VAS) of the TMJ during mandibular movements was rated 58 among the controls and 61 in the treatment group. At the 3 months follow-up, treatment was considered successful in 76% of the controls and 50% of the treatment group. Mouth opening capacity was 34 mm and 33 mm at baseline and 43mm and 38 mm after 3 months among the controls and in the treatment group, respectively. These differences between groups in pain intensity (VAS), successful treatment outcome (≥ 30%), and mouth opening capacity (mm) were non-significant between groups. Conclusion: Use of lavage to supplement extra-articular local anesthetic treatment of painful reduced mouth opening at non-reducing dics does not appear to improve treatment outcome. only.
Publisher Svensk Förening för Bettfysiologi, Höstmöte 2008, Stockholm
Language eng (iso)
Subject(s) Medicine
Research Subject Categories::ODONTOLOGY
Handle http://hdl.handle.net/2043/7058 (link to this page)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Search


Browse

My Account

Statistics